README

VINEXEL Core Engine

The Runtime Foundation of the Vinexel Framework

Scientific. Modular. Deterministic. Extensible. Efficient.

“The framework provides the structure. The engine makes it work.”

About Vinexel Core Engine

Vinexel Core Engine is the independent runtime engine that powers the Vinexel Framework ecosystem.

It contains the foundational execution mechanisms required to receive requests, initialize the application, resolve projects, load routes, execute middleware, dispatch controllers, render responses, manage errors, and coordinate shared framework services.

The Core Engine is intentionally separated from the Vinexel Framework skeleton.

This separation allows the application structure and runtime implementation to evolve independently while remaining connected through stable contracts.

The framework skeleton defines how developers organize applications.

The Core Engine defines how those applications are executed.

Core Engine and Framework Skeleton

Vinexel consists of two primary layers:

Layer	Responsibility
Framework Skeleton	Provides the application structure, project organization, configuration, routes, controllers, services, models, views, and developer-facing conventions.
Core Engine	Provides the runtime kernel, request lifecycle, routing execution, middleware pipeline, service coordination, error handling, and infrastructure integration.

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                  Vinexel Framework Skeleton                  │
│                                                              │
│  Projects · Controllers · Services · Models · Routes · Views │
│  Configuration · Application Logic · Developer Conventions   │
└──────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
                               │
                               │ Stable Contracts
                               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Vinexel Core Engine                       │
│                                                              │
│  Bootstrap · Kernel · Router · Middleware · Request ·        │
│  Response · Security · Events · Errors · Infrastructure      │
└──────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
                               │
                               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       PHP Runtime                            │
│                                                              │
│     Web Server · Database · Redis · Filesystem · Network     │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The skeleton depends on the engine.

The engine must not depend on project-specific application logic.

Purpose

Vinexel Core Engine exists to provide a stable, reusable, and scientifically engineered runtime foundation for every Vinexel application.

Its responsibilities include:

bootstrapping the application;
resolving the active project or tenant;
creating the request context;
loading configuration;
initializing framework services;
registering routes;
executing middleware;
dispatching controllers;
coordinating application services;
generating responses;
handling exceptions;
recording runtime diagnostics;
and terminating the request safely.

The engine is designed to remain independent from business logic, user interfaces, and project-specific implementation details.

Engineering Philosophy

The Core Engine is developed according to measurable engineering principles rather than feature accumulation.

Principle	Meaning
Determinism	The same valid input and configuration should produce predictable runtime behavior.
Minimalism	The engine should contain only foundational runtime responsibilities.
Modularity	Components should remain focused, replaceable, and independently testable.
Isolation	Project logic must remain outside the core runtime.
Explicitness	Runtime behavior, dependencies, and execution order should remain understandable.
Efficiency	Initialization and execution should avoid unnecessary computation and memory usage.
Extensibility	Applications should extend the engine through contracts, providers, middleware, and events.
Observability	Runtime behavior should be measurable through logs, metrics, traces, and diagnostics.
Backward Stability	Public contracts should evolve carefully and predictably.
Scientific Validation	Architectural and performance decisions should be supported by testing and measurement.

Scientific Runtime Development

Core Engine development follows a disciplined engineering cycle:

Observe Runtime Behavior
          ↓
Identify the Fundamental Problem
          ↓
Form an Engineering Hypothesis
          ↓
Design the Smallest Coherent Change
          ↓
Test Correctness and Compatibility
          ↓
Measure Performance and Resource Usage
          ↓
Document the Result
          ↓
Refine the Runtime

Changes should be evaluated according to:

correctness;
execution predictability;
memory consumption;
response latency;
initialization cost;
security impact;
maintainability;
backward compatibility;
and operational reliability.

Runtime Architecture

Vinexel Core Engine uses a modular runtime architecture centered around the application kernel.

Incoming Request
       │
       ▼
Public Entry Point
       │
       ▼
Bootstrap Process
       │
       ▼
Application Kernel
       │
       ├── Configuration
       ├── Environment
       ├── Service Registry
       ├── Project Resolver
       ├── Route Loader
       ├── Middleware Pipeline
       ├── Controller Dispatcher
       ├── Response Handler
       └── Exception Handler
       │
       ▼
Application Response

Each runtime component has a focused responsibility and communicates through explicit contracts.

Request Lifecycle

A typical Vinexel request follows this lifecycle:

1. Receive the HTTP request
2. Initialize the runtime environment
3. Load configuration
4. Resolve the active project or tenant
5. Register framework services
6. Create the request context
7. Load project routes
8. Match the requested route
9. Execute global middleware
10. Execute route middleware
11. Dispatch the controller action
12. Execute application logic
13. Generate the response
14. Apply response middleware
15. Send the response
16. Run termination handlers

The request lifecycle should remain observable, predictable, and independently testable.

Core Components

Bootstrap

The bootstrap layer initializes the minimum runtime state required to start the application.

Typical responsibilities include:

loading environment variables;
registering autoloaders;
defining runtime paths;
loading configuration;
initializing error handling;
creating the application instance;
and starting the kernel.

The bootstrap process should remain lightweight and free from project-specific business logic.

Application Kernel

The application kernel is the central runtime coordinator.

It is responsible for:

receiving the request;
initializing shared services;
executing global middleware;
invoking the router;
coordinating exception handling;
returning the final response;
and terminating request-level resources.

Conceptually:

$request = Request::capture();

$response = $kernel->handle($request);

$response->send();

$kernel->terminate($request, $response);

The kernel coordinates components without absorbing all their internal responsibilities.

Request

The request component provides structured access to incoming HTTP data.

It can expose:

HTTP method;
URI;
query parameters;
form data;
JSON payloads;
uploaded files;
cookies;
headers;
client information;
host;
port;
project context;
and route parameters.

Example:

$name = $request->input('name');
$email = $request->post('email');
$page = $request->query('page', 1);

if ($request->isPost()) {
    // Process the request.
}

Incoming data should remain distinguishable from validated application data.

Response

The response component represents the outgoing application result.

Supported response types can include:

HTML responses;
JSON responses;
redirects;
file downloads;
streamed responses;
error responses;
and empty responses.

Example:

return Response::json([
    'success' => true,
    'data' => $result,
]);

Response generation should remain independent from transport output whenever possible.

Router

The router matches incoming requests to registered application actions.

Core routing responsibilities include:

HTTP method matching;
URI pattern matching;
dynamic parameters;
named routes;
middleware assignment;
controller resolution;
project-specific route loading;
and route caching.

Example route:

Router::get('/users/{id}', 'UserController@show')
    ->name('users.show')
    ->middleware('auth');

Example route resolution:

GET /users/42
        ↓
UserController@show
        ↓
Route parameter: id = 42

The router should only resolve and dispatch routes.

Business logic belongs in application services.

Route Loader

The route loader determines which route definitions must be loaded for the active project.

It can support:

dynamic route loading;
cached route loading;
project-specific route files;
API routes;
web routes;
administrative routes;
domain-specific routes;
and modular route providers.

Active Project
      ↓
Route Loader
      ↓
Project Route Files
      ↓
Compiled Route Collection
      ↓
Router

Route loading should avoid parsing unrelated project routes during every request.

Middleware Pipeline

Middleware processes requests before or after the main application action.

Request
   ↓
Global Middleware
   ↓
Project Middleware
   ↓
Route Middleware
   ↓
Controller
   ↓
Response Middleware
   ↓
Response

Middleware can be used for:

session initialization;
authentication;
authorization;
CSRF validation;
request sanitization;
locale detection;
rate limiting;
maintenance mode;
security headers;
logging;
and response transformation.

Example:

final class Authenticate
{
    public function handle(Request $request, Closure $next): Response
    {
        if (!Auth::check()) {
            return Response::redirect('/login');
        }

        return $next($request);
    }
}

Middleware should perform focused request or response concerns rather than contain general business logic.

Controller Dispatcher

The controller dispatcher resolves and executes the route target.

Its responsibilities include:

resolving controller classes;
validating controller methods;
injecting route parameters;
invoking controller actions;
normalizing returned values;
and converting results into responses.

Matched Route
     ↓
Controller Resolver
     ↓
Method Validation
     ↓
Parameter Resolution
     ↓
Controller Execution
     ↓
Response Normalization

The dispatcher should reject invalid, inaccessible, or ambiguous route targets.

Project Resolver

The project resolver determines which application project should handle the current request.

Resolution may use:

domain name;
port;
environment configuration;
database records;
tenant mappings;
command-line context;
or custom resolution strategies.

Example:

app-one.example.com → ProjectOne
app-two.example.com → ProjectTwo
127.0.0.1:8001     → ProjectOne
127.0.0.1:8002     → ProjectTwo

The resolver produces an explicit project context that can be used throughout the request lifecycle.

Service Registry

The service registry manages shared runtime services and their bindings.

Typical services include:

router;
database;
cache;
session;
logger;
filesystem;
configuration;
event dispatcher;
encryption;
validation;
and project resolution.

The registry should support:

interface-to-implementation bindings;
singleton services;
transient services;
lazy initialization;
service factories;
and environment-specific implementations.

Example concept:

$services->singleton(CacheInterface::class, function () {
    return new RedisCache();
});

Services should be resolved through contracts rather than hidden global dependencies whenever practical.

Configuration

The configuration system provides structured access to runtime settings.

Configuration may originate from:

environment variables;
configuration files;
project configuration;
runtime overrides;
and cached configuration.

Example:

$appName = config('app.name');
$debug = config('app.debug', false);

Configuration should be loaded once, normalized, and reused throughout the request.

Sensitive configuration must not be exposed in public error messages or logs.

Environment

The environment component identifies the current runtime context.

Supported environments can include:

development
testing
staging
production

Environment state can control:

error visibility;
log level;
cache strategy;
database configuration;
security policies;
debugging;
and service implementations.

Production mode should prioritize security, stability, and controlled diagnostics.

Events

The event system allows runtime components and applications to communicate without tight coupling.

Potential events include:

engine.booting
engine.booted
request.received
project.resolved
routes.loading
routes.loaded
route.matched
middleware.executing
controller.dispatching
response.created
response.sending
request.terminated
exception.thrown

Example:

$events->listen('route.matched', function ($event) {
    // Record routing diagnostics.
});

Events should not make core execution order unpredictable.

Critical operations should remain explicit.

Exception Handling

The exception handler converts runtime failures into controlled application responses.

Responsibilities include:

classifying exceptions;
recording error context;
generating environment-safe responses;
mapping exceptions to HTTP status codes;
preserving request identifiers;
and preventing sensitive data exposure.

Exception
    ↓
Classification
    ↓
Logging
    ↓
Environment Policy
    ↓
Safe Response

Development responses may include detailed diagnostics.

Production responses should remain minimal and secure.

Logging

The logging system records structured runtime events.

Recommended log context includes:

timestamp;
log level;
request identifier;
active project;
route name;
exception class;
execution duration;
memory usage;
user identifier when appropriate;
and environment.

Example:

$logger->error('Route dispatch failed', [
    'request_id' => $requestId,
    'project' => $project,
    'route' => $routeName,
    'exception' => $exception::class,
]);

Sensitive values such as passwords, authentication tokens, and secret keys must never be logged.

Cache

The cache subsystem provides shared caching contracts for runtime and application use.

Potential cache drivers include:

filesystem;
Redis;
in-memory storage;
database;
and custom adapters.

The engine can use cache for:

routes;
configuration;
service metadata;
compiled templates;
project mappings;
and reusable runtime data.

Cache operations should support explicit expiration and predictable invalidation.

Session

The session subsystem manages state across requests.

Potential session drivers include:

native PHP sessions;
filesystem;
Redis;
database;
and custom session storage.

Core responsibilities include:

session initialization;
identifier regeneration;
secure cookie configuration;
flash data;
session persistence;
and session termination.

Authentication state should not be trusted without appropriate validation and rotation policies.

Security

Security is integrated into the runtime lifecycle.

The engine can provide foundational support for:

CSRF protection;
request validation;
input sanitization;
secure headers;
session protection;
cookie policies;
path validation;
host validation;
exception sanitization;
and suspicious request detection.

Security components should remain configurable and independently testable.

The engine must not silently alter valid application data in ways that make behavior unpredictable.

Database Integration

The Core Engine can coordinate database services without embedding project-specific database logic.

Responsibilities may include:

connection management;
connection configuration;
transaction coordination;
driver selection;
query logging;
and connection lifecycle management.

The engine provides infrastructure.

Application models and repositories define domain-specific queries.

View Integration

The engine can coordinate view rendering through a view contract.

Supported renderers may include:

native PHP;
Rapid templates;
Twig-compatible templates;
JSON serialization;
and custom renderers.

Example:

return $view->render(
    'pages.dashboard',
    ['user' => $user]
);

The engine should not require one rendering technology when a stable rendering contract can support multiple implementations.

Architectural Boundaries

Vinexel Core Engine must remain independent from application-level concerns.

The Core Engine May Contain

runtime contracts;
request and response abstractions;
routing;
middleware execution;
application kernel;
service coordination;
configuration;
logging;
cache contracts;
session contracts;
exception handling;
security foundations;
and runtime diagnostics.

The Core Engine Must Not Contain

project-specific controllers;
business rules;
application models;
product features;
user interface templates;
project branding;
tenant-specific logic;
application-specific database queries;
or domain-specific workflows.

Dependency Direction

The intended dependency direction is:

Application Projects
        ↓
Framework Skeleton
        ↓
Core Engine Contracts
        ↓
Core Engine Runtime
        ↓
PHP and Infrastructure

The Core Engine must never depend upward on a specific application project.

Invalid dependency examples:

Core Engine → Project Controller
Core Engine → Application Model
Core Engine → Product Service
Core Engine → Project View

Valid dependency examples:

Project Controller → Engine Request Contract
Project Middleware → Engine Middleware Contract
Framework Router → Engine Route Collection
Application Service → Engine Cache Contract

Extension Model

The Core Engine should be extended through controlled mechanisms.

Supported extension points can include:

service providers;
middleware;
events;
contracts;
adapters;
route providers;
cache drivers;
session drivers;
log handlers;
response renderers;
and project resolvers.

Service Providers

Service providers register or initialize framework and application services.

Example:

final class DatabaseServiceProvider
{
    public function register(ServiceRegistry $services): void
    {
        $services->singleton(
            DatabaseInterface::class,
            fn () => new Database(config('database'))
        );
    }

    public function boot(): void
    {
        // Perform post-registration initialization.
    }
}

Service registration and service booting should remain separate phases.

Contracts

Contracts define stable boundaries between the engine and external implementations.

Potential contracts include:

RequestInterface
ResponseInterface
RouterInterface
MiddlewareInterface
CacheInterface
SessionInterface
LoggerInterface
DatabaseInterface
ProjectResolverInterface
ViewRendererInterface
ExceptionHandlerInterface

Contracts allow the framework to replace implementations without changing application-facing behavior.

Adapters

Adapters connect engine contracts to external infrastructure.

Examples:

RedisCacheAdapter
FilesystemCacheAdapter
NativeSessionAdapter
RedisSessionAdapter
PdoDatabaseAdapter
MonologAdapter
TwigRendererAdapter

Adapters should translate external behavior into stable engine interfaces.

Suggested Core Structure

core/
├── Bootstrap/
│   ├── ApplicationBootstrap.php
│   ├── EnvironmentLoader.php
│   └── PathResolver.php
│
├── Contracts/
│   ├── CacheInterface.php
│   ├── LoggerInterface.php
│   ├── MiddlewareInterface.php
│   ├── ProjectResolverInterface.php
│   ├── RequestInterface.php
│   ├── ResponseInterface.php
│   └── RouterInterface.php
│
├── Foundation/
│   ├── Application.php
│   ├── Kernel.php
│   ├── ServiceRegistry.php
│   └── ServiceProvider.php
│
├── Http/
│   ├── Request.php
│   ├── Response.php
│   ├── UploadedFile.php
│   └── HeaderBag.php
│
├── Routing/
│   ├── Router.php
│   ├── Route.php
│   ├── RouteCollection.php
│   ├── RouteLoader.php
│   └── ControllerDispatcher.php
│
├── Middleware/
│   ├── MiddlewarePipeline.php
│   └── MiddlewareResolver.php
│
├── Projects/
│   ├── ProjectContext.php
│   ├── ProjectResolver.php
│   └── ProjectRegistry.php
│
├── Configuration/
│   ├── Config.php
│   ├── ConfigLoader.php
│   └── ConfigRepository.php
│
├── Events/
│   ├── EventDispatcher.php
│   └── ListenerProvider.php
│
├── Exceptions/
│   ├── ExceptionHandler.php
│   ├── HttpException.php
│   └── RuntimeException.php
│
├── Security/
│   ├── CsrfProtection.php
│   ├── HostValidator.php
│   ├── RequestSanitizer.php
│   └── SecurityException.php
│
├── Cache/
├── Session/
├── Logging/
├── Database/
├── Support/
└── Testing/

The actual structure may evolve as the engine is refined, but each module should preserve a focused responsibility.

Performance Principles

Vinexel Core Engine is designed to minimize unnecessary runtime overhead.

Performance strategies may include:

lazy service initialization;
configuration caching;
route caching;
optimized autoloading;
project-specific route loading;
reusable immutable objects;
controlled middleware depth;
minimal global state;
reduced filesystem access;
efficient request parsing;
and predictable resource cleanup.

Performance claims must be validated through reproducible benchmarks.

Recommended measurements include:

Metric	Purpose
Bootstrap Time	Measures engine initialization cost.
Request Latency	Measures end-to-end response duration.
Memory Usage	Measures runtime memory consumption.
Peak Memory	Identifies expensive execution paths.
Route Match Time	Measures routing efficiency.
Middleware Time	Measures pipeline overhead.
Service Resolution Time	Measures container or registry cost.
Throughput	Measures requests processed under load.
Error Rate	Measures runtime reliability.

Optimization must not reduce correctness, security, or maintainability.

Reliability Principles

The engine should fail predictably and safely.

Reliability mechanisms can include:

explicit exception classification;
deterministic boot order;
validated configuration;
controlled service initialization;
transaction-safe termination;
request identifiers;
health checks;
graceful degradation;
defensive resource cleanup;
and structured error reporting.

The engine should not hide critical failures behind silent fallback behavior.

Observability

The Core Engine should make runtime behavior visible without coupling application logic to diagnostics.

Potential observability capabilities include:

request tracing;
structured logging;
lifecycle events;
execution timing;
route diagnostics;
middleware timing;
service-resolution tracking;
memory monitoring;
database query logging;
cache hit and miss metrics;
and exception classification.

Request ID
    ↓
Project Resolution
    ↓
Route Matching
    ↓
Middleware Execution
    ↓
Controller Dispatch
    ↓
Response Generation
    ↓
Termination Metrics

Every request should be traceable across the complete lifecycle when observability is enabled.

Testing Strategy

The Core Engine should be validated through several layers of testing.

Unit Tests

Test isolated runtime components such as:

route matching;
request parsing;
response creation;
middleware execution;
configuration loading;
service resolution;
and exception classification.

Integration Tests

Test cooperation between components such as:

router and dispatcher;
middleware and kernel;
project resolver and route loader;
session and authentication;
cache and configuration;
and exception handling.

Runtime Tests

Test complete request lifecycles in representative environments.

Performance Tests

Measure latency, memory, throughput, and initialization overhead.

Compatibility Tests

Verify supported PHP versions, operating systems, web servers, and infrastructure adapters.

Security Tests

Validate host handling, input processing, CSRF controls, session behavior, path safety, and error sanitization.

Compatibility

Vinexel Core Engine is intended for modern PHP environments.

Recommended requirements:

PHP 8.3 or later;
Composer-compatible autoloading;
JSON extension;
Mbstring extension;
OpenSSL extension;
PDO;
and a supported web server or PHP runtime.

Optional integrations may include:

Redis;
MySQL;
MariaDB;
PostgreSQL;
SQLite;
Nginx;
Apache;
FrankenPHP;
and other compatible runtime environments.

Installation

Vinexel Core Engine is normally installed and managed as a dependency of the Vinexel Framework skeleton.

Developers building standard Vinexel applications generally do not need to install the engine separately.

Vinexel Framework Skeleton
          ↓
Dependency Resolution
          ↓
Vinexel Core Engine
          ↓
Application Runtime

Direct installation is intended primarily for:

framework contributors;
runtime researchers;
engine maintainers;
custom distribution builders;
and advanced integration developers.

Basic Runtime Integration

A simplified entry point may resemble:

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

require dirname(__DIR__) . '/vendor/autoload.php';

use Vinexel\Core\Foundation\Application;
use Vinexel\Core\Http\Request;

$application = Application::create(
    basePath: dirname(__DIR__)
);

$request = Request::capture();

$response = $application
    ->kernel()
    ->handle($request);

$response->send();

$application
    ->kernel()
    ->terminate($request, $response);

The exact bootstrap API may evolve as the Core Engine reaches stable release milestones.

Versioning and Stability

The Core Engine should follow semantic versioning.

MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

Major Version

May contain breaking changes to public contracts or runtime behavior.

Minor Version

Adds backward-compatible functionality.

Patch Version

Contains backward-compatible bug fixes, security improvements, or internal optimizations.

Public contracts should be treated as stability boundaries.

Internal implementation details may evolve without being considered part of the public API.

Backward Compatibility

Core Engine changes should preserve compatibility whenever reasonably possible.

Breaking changes should include:

clear migration documentation;
deprecation periods;
compatibility notes;
updated tests;
and a documented architectural justification.

Deprecations should remain visible and actionable rather than silently removed.

Security Policy

Security issues should be reported privately through an official Vinexel security channel before public disclosure.

Reports should include:

affected component;
reproduction steps;
impact assessment;
environment information;
and a proposed mitigation when available.

Security fixes should prioritize user protection, backward safety, and responsible disclosure.

Contributing

Contributions to Vinexel Core Engine should preserve architectural clarity and runtime stability.

A contribution should:

Define the runtime problem clearly.
Explain why the problem belongs in the Core Engine.
Preserve separation from project-specific logic.
Include tests for affected behavior.
Document compatibility consequences.
Include measurements for performance claims.
Avoid unnecessary abstractions.
Preserve secure default behavior.
Update documentation when public contracts change.

The Core Engine should not become a storage location for features that belong in the framework skeleton or application projects.

Core Contribution Standard

Before adding a new component, determine whether it satisfies all of the following:

required by multiple applications;
foundational to runtime execution;
independent from business logic;
expressible through a stable contract;
testable in isolation;
maintainable over the long term;
and beneficial enough to justify additional engine complexity.

When these conditions are not met, the component should remain outside the Core Engine.

Project Status

Vinexel Core Engine is under active research and development.

Its runtime architecture, public contracts, module boundaries, and internal APIs may continue to evolve until the engine reaches a stable release.

Production adoption should include:

version pinning;
automated tests;
security review;
runtime monitoring;
deployment rollback procedures;
and compatibility validation.

Roadmap

Planned Core Engine development areas include:

stable application kernel;
deterministic request lifecycle;
modular service registry;
route compilation and caching;
middleware pipeline optimization;
database-driven project resolution;
structured exception classification;
runtime diagnostics;
engine-level testing utilities;
asynchronous capability research;
command-line runtime integration;
and long-term contract stabilization.

Roadmap items should be treated as research and development objectives rather than guaranteed release commitments.

Documentation

Planned Core Engine documentation includes:

runtime architecture;
bootstrap lifecycle;
application kernel;
request and response;
routing internals;
middleware execution;
project resolution;
service providers;
runtime contracts;
events;
security;
exception handling;
caching;
sessions;
logging;
testing;
performance benchmarking;
extension development;
and framework integration.

Official Links

Resource	Link
Website	vinexel.com
Framework	Vinexel Framework
Component	Vinexel Core Engine
Documentation	Coming soon
Author	Elwira Perdana
Ecosystem	Vinexel
License	MIT License

Support the Engine

Vinexel Core Engine grows through independent research, runtime engineering, architectural experimentation, testing, documentation, and open-source collaboration.

Sponsorship helps support:

runtime architecture research;
performance testing;
security improvement;
compatibility testing;
developer documentation;
infrastructure integration;
and long-term engine maintenance.

Support the Vinexel Ecosystem

Strengthen the engine. Advance the framework. Expand the ecosystem.

License

Vinexel Core Engine is open-source software licensed under the MIT License.

See the LICENSE file for the complete license terms.

SCIENCE · RUNTIME · MODULARITY · EXCELLENCE

The independent engine behind the Vinexel Framework.

vinexel / vision-serve

Maintainers

Package info

Fund package maintenance!

Statistics

Security

README

VINEXEL Core Engine

The Runtime Foundation of the Vinexel Framework

About Vinexel Core Engine

Core Engine and Framework Skeleton

Purpose

Engineering Philosophy

Scientific Runtime Development

Runtime Architecture

Request Lifecycle

Core Components

Bootstrap

Application Kernel

Request

Response

Router

Route Loader

Middleware Pipeline

Controller Dispatcher

Project Resolver

Service Registry

Configuration

Environment

Events

Exception Handling

Logging

Cache

Session

Security

Database Integration

View Integration

Architectural Boundaries

The Core Engine May Contain

The Core Engine Must Not Contain

Dependency Direction

Extension Model

Service Providers

Contracts

Adapters

Suggested Core Structure

Performance Principles

Reliability Principles

Observability

Testing Strategy

Unit Tests

Integration Tests

Runtime Tests

Performance Tests

Compatibility Tests

Security Tests

Compatibility

Installation

Basic Runtime Integration

Versioning and Stability

Major Version

Minor Version

Patch Version

Backward Compatibility

Security Policy

Contributing

Core Contribution Standard

Project Status

Roadmap

Documentation

Official Links

Support the Engine

Support the Vinexel Ecosystem

License

SCIENCE · RUNTIME · MODULARITY · EXCELLENCE