routing-interop / route-definition
Abstract definition of a route
Requires
- php: >=7.4
README
Installation
$ composer require routing-interop/route
Usage
<?php use Interop\Routing\Route\RouteCollection; $routes = (new RouteCollection) ->get('/blog', [BlogController::class, 'index']) ->get('/blog/{slug}', [BlogController::class, 'show']) ->post('/blog', [BlogController::class, 'create']) ;
Thougts
-
Most routing libraries use the following route declaration format:
addRoute(<HTTP method>, <path>, <callable handler>)
-
path
can be a string, a regex, or a custom format. It usually contains all the variable parts or the path, the type constraints. -
Each path part is a segment (typical URI language).
-
Simple string segments are static, while others are dynamic.
-
Other route constraints not contained in
path
:- Host
- Scheme
- Port
-
A dynamic segment can be optional and have a default value
-
Using a common static prefix for a bunch of routes is very useful
-
Declaring a group of routes with the same path but not the same method can be useful
-
What to do when no route is matched? Wrong URI, wrong method, ...
It may be useful to add default workflow and responses. -
Giving a name to routes seems deprecated. Wait... no, it isn't: how do we generate URIs without names!?
-
Content negotiation is not is the scope of routing
-
Parameter conversion (from
/post/{slug}
tocontroller(BlogPost $post)
) is out of scope.